Respect for Intellectual Property Rights – Lessons from the “Ong Tho” Character during the Halloween Costume Season
1. A real-life story: When “just having a little fun” can still
violate the law
On October 30, images circulated on social media of individuals
dressing up as “Ong Tho” – the brand icon of Vinamilk’s sweetened condensed
milk – to celebrate Halloween. Shortly thereafter, Vinamilk issued an urgent
announcement affirming that the image of the Ong Tho character is intellectual
property owned by the company.
As some of the costume-related content was considered
“inconsistent with the brand’s identity,” Vinamilk requested that individuals
and organizations cease using the Ong Tho image without authorization, and
asked those wishing to use it to submit a formal cooperation request.
From what seemed like a light-hearted incident, an important legal
issue emerges: intellectual property (IP) rights in the age of social media
must be properly understood and respected—especially by young people, KOLs,
celebrities, and content creators.
2. Intellectual property rights under the Law on Intellectual
Property 2005
(as amended and supplemented in 2009, 2019, and 2022)
The Law on Intellectual Property 2005 (as amended and supplemented
in 2009, 2019, and 2022) provides that:
Under the current Law on Intellectual Property:
- IP
right holders have the right to request the cessation of infringing acts,
demand public apologies and corrections, and claim damages, pursuant to
Point b, Clause 1, Article 198 of the Law on Intellectual Property 2005
(as amended and supplemented in 2009, 2019, and 2022).
- Trademarks,
logos, and distinctive images, if registered for protection, are legally
recognized as intellectual property of the owner, pursuant to Point a,
Clause 3, Article 6 of the Law on Intellectual Property 2005 (as amended
and supplemented in 2009, 2019, and 2022).
- Unauthorized
use of images, logos, or brand characters without the consent of the owner
may constitute infringement of industrial property rights or copyright,
depending on the form of protection.
Specifically:
- Under
Point a, Clause 3, Article 6 of the Law on Intellectual Property 2005 (as
amended and supplemented in 2009, 2019, and 2022), industrial property
rights to trademarks are established on the basis of protection titles
granted by competent state authorities.
- Pursuant
to Clause 1, Article 125 of the Law on Intellectual Property 2005 (as
amended and supplemented in 2009, 2019, and 2022), the owner has the right
to prevent others from using industrial property objects within the scope
of protection.
- Acts
of using signs identical or confusingly similar to protected trademarks,
under Points a and d, Clause 1, Article 129 of the Law on Intellectual
Property 2005 (as amended and supplemented in 2009, 2019, and 2022), are
considered trademark infringement.
- In
addition, for original creative images or characters, unauthorized copying
or use may also infringe copyright under Articles 19 and 20 of the Law on
Intellectual Property 2005 (as amended and supplemented in 2009, 2019, and
2022), which grant authors and copyright owners the right to permit or
prohibit others from copying, using, displaying, or distributing their
works.
Accordingly, the image of the “Ong Tho” character—closely
associated with Vinamilk’s sweetened condensed milk product—is a registered and
protected brand asset. Any use, reproduction, adaptation, or costuming for
commercial purposes (such as advertising, TikTok videos, or viral clips)
without authorization carries a potential risk of legal violation.
3. When “fun content” turns into “legal risk”
Many young people and influencers believe that “it’s just cosplay
or for fun, not for selling anything.” However, under current law:
- If
the use of brand images in social media content involves promotion,
engagement, or personal benefit, it may still be considered commercial
use, pursuant to Articles 124 and 129 of the Law on Intellectual Property
2005 (as amended and supplemented in 2009, 2019, and 2022).
- If
images are used in a provocative, offensive, or brand-distorting manner,
the owner has the right to request removal, an apology, or even initiate
legal proceedings.
Therefore, even when it is “just a costume,” social media users
should carefully consider before using brand images or famous characters.
4. Legal lessons for young people, KOLs, and content creators
a. Identify the origin of images and symbols before use
Before posting, cosplaying, or using images on social media, check whether the
image is protected by intellectual property rights.
b. Obtain permission when using brand images
If you wish to use them, contact the owner and obtain written permission.
Vinamilk clearly stated: “If there is a need to use the Ong Tho image, please
submit a formal cooperation request.”
This not only demonstrates respect for the law but also helps
build a professional image for content creators.
c. Avoid distorting or mocking brands
Acts such as image manipulation or cosplay related to brands may be perceived
by the owner as offensive or damaging to the brand’s reputation.
Under the law, such acts may constitute infringement of industrial
property rights relating to trademarks.
d. Keep clear evidence of cooperation or licensing
If permission has been granted, retain emails, messages, contracts, or written
approvals to avoid future disputes.
e. Be cautious when content is disseminated internationally
If images are widely shared beyond Vietnam, attention should be paid to
international treaties (such as the Paris Convention, TRIPS, and the Madrid
System), as protection may apply across borders.
5. Conclusion: Respect intellectual property – Build a civilized
creative environment
The incident involving the “Ong Tho” character during the
Halloween costume season is a reminder that, in an era of booming content
creation, intellectual property rights are not only a concern for businesses,
but also a responsibility of each individual.
Respecting intellectual property does not hinder creativity—it
helps creators remain civilized, professional, and legally safe.
Key takeaways
- Intellectual
property rights are legally protected assets.
- IP
infringement may result in administrative penalties, mandatory content
removal, compensation for damages, or legal action.
- Always
seek permission before use, maintain a respectful attitude, and avoid
content that causes misunderstanding or offends brands.
Relate news
- Legal Framework on Separate Property Acquired Before Marriage
- REGULATORY UPDATE: CONTROLLED SANDBOX MECHANISM IN THE BANKING SECTOR UNDER DECREE NO. 94/2025/ND-CP
- PROUD TO PARTNER WITH UEF IN CONNECTING EDUCATION, BUSINESS, AND SOCIETY
- GLOBAL MINIMUM TAX – CHALLENGE OR OPPORTUNITY FOR FDI ENTERPRISES IN VIETNAM?
- VIETNAM OFFICIALLY OPENS THE CRYPTO ASSET MARKET: A NEW GATEWAY TO THE DIGITAL FINANCE ERA
- THE E-COMMERCE LAW 2025: A LEGAL MILESTONE FOR A TRANSPARENT AND SUSTAINABLE DIGITAL ERA
- AMENDED LAW ON ENTERPRISES 2025 – TRANSPARENCY OF BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP: A KEY TO COMBATING FRAUD AND BUILDING TRUST
- CHANGES IN LAND LAW: A “GOLDEN TICKET” FOR INNOVATION AND BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT
- SIX KEY NEW POINTS OF THE 2025 LAW ON CREDIT INSTITUTIONS: WHAT BUSINESSES AND INDIVIDUALS NEED TO KNOW
- CONGRATULATIONS ON THE 80TH ANNIVERSARY OF VIETNAMESE LAWYERS’ DAY (10/10/1945 – 10/10/2025)
Authors
Hot news
- » CỔ ĐÔNG SỞ HỮU BAO NHIÊU CỔ PHẦN THÌ ĐƯỢC QUYỀN KIỂM SOÁT CÔNG TY
- » RỦI RO PHÁP LÝ KHI ĐẤT CÓ SỔ NHƯNG NHÀ CHƯA ĐƯỢC CẤP SỔ
- » LỪA ĐẢO BAO NHIÊU TIỀN THÌ BỊ ĐI TÙ ?
- » HOÀN THIỆN QUY ĐỊNH VỀ LOGISTICS ĐỂ BẮT KỊP SỰ BÙNG NỔ CỦA THƯƠNG MẠI ĐIỆN TỬ
- » Ngân hàng nhà nước ban hành Thông tư 12/2022/TT-NHNN
- » LOGISTICS TRONG THƯƠNG MẠI ĐIỆN TỬ VÀ NHỮNG BẤT CẬP VỀ PHÁP LUẬT
- » CÔNG TY FINTECH VÀ HÀNH LANG PHÁP LÝ
- » ONEX LOGISTICS AND CELIGAL SIGN COOPERATION AGREEMENT
- » Một Số Điểm Đáng Chú Ý Của Nghị Định 112/2021/NĐ-CP Quy Định Chi Tiết Một Số Điều Và Biện Pháp Thi Hành Luật Người Lao Động Việt Nam Đi Làm Việc Ở Nước Ngoài Theo Hợp Đồng
- » LAND DISPUTE RESOLUTION

