REGULATIONS ON COERCIVE ENFORCEMENT OF CIVIL JUDGMENTS
In a developed society, the legal system is established in a
comprehensive and rigorous manner to protect the lawful rights and interests of
all individuals and organizations without discrimination. Respect for and
compliance with the law are essential to maintaining social order and justice.
However, in practice, parties do not always voluntarily fulfill their
obligations and responsibilities, particularly in cases involving disputes or
contractual breaches. Even where a Court Judgment or Decision requires
enforcement, non-compliance, delay, or refusal to perform obligations may still
occur.
Therefore, coercive enforcement of civil judgments becomes necessary to
compel judgment debtors to fulfill their obligations and to safeguard the
lawful rights and interests of judgment creditors. Nevertheless, this process
is often complex and may encounter obstacles from both legal and practical
perspectives.
I. What Is Coercive Enforcement of Civil Judgments?
Pursuant to Clause 2, Article 9 of the Law on Civil Judgment
Enforcement, it is provided that:
"Where a judgment debtor has conditions for enforcement but fails to
voluntarily enforce the judgment, coercive enforcement shall be applied in
accordance with this Law."
In general terms, coercive enforcement of civil judgments refers
to measures applied to compel a party to fulfill its obligations where it fails
to voluntarily comply with a court judgment or decision, or a decision of a
competent civil judgment enforcement authority.
Voluntary Enforcement Period
Pursuant to Article 45 of the Law on Civil Judgment Enforcement:
Article 45. Voluntary Enforcement Period
1. The voluntary enforcement period shall be ten (10) days from the date the
judgment debtor receives the enforcement decision or is duly notified thereof.
2. Where it is necessary to prevent the judgment debtor from dispersing or
destroying assets or committing other acts to evade enforcement, the
enforcement officer shall immediately apply measures prescribed in Chapter IV
of this Law.
Time Limits for Coercive Enforcement
Pursuant to Article 46 of the Law on Civil Judgment Enforcement:
Article 46. Coercive Enforcement
1. Upon expiration of the voluntary enforcement period prescribed in Clause
1, Article 45 of this Law, if the judgment debtor has conditions for
enforcement but fails to voluntarily enforce the judgment, coercive enforcement
shall be applied.
2. Coercive enforcement shall not be carried out between 10:00 p.m. and 6:00
a.m. of the following day, on public holidays, statutory days off, or in other
special cases as prescribed by the Government.
II. General Regulations on Coercive Enforcement of
Civil Judgments
a. Grounds for Coercive Enforcement
Pursuant to Article 70 of the Law on Civil Judgment Enforcement,
the grounds for coercive enforcement include:
- Court
judgments or decisions;
- Enforcement
decisions;
- Decisions
on coercive enforcement, except in cases where the judgment or decision
already orders seizure or freezing of assets or accounts, or where
enforcement of interim emergency measures ordered by the Court is carried
out.
b. Measures of Coercive Enforcement
Pursuant to Article 71 of the Law on Civil Judgment Enforcement,
coercive enforcement measures include:
- Deduction
of money from accounts; recovery and handling of money and valuable papers
of the judgment debtor;
- Deduction
from the income of the judgment debtor;
- Seizure
and handling of assets of the judgment debtor, including assets held by
third parties;
- Exploitation
of assets of the judgment debtor;
- Compulsory
transfer of property, transfer of property rights, or delivery of
documents;
- Compelling
the judgment debtor to perform or refrain from performing specific acts.
c. Plan for Coercive Enforcement
Pursuant to Article 72 of the Law on Civil Judgment Enforcement:
- Except
in cases requiring immediate enforcement, enforcement officers must
prepare a coercive enforcement plan prior to implementation.
- The
enforcement plan shall include the following key contents:
- Name
of the person subject to coercive enforcement;
- Applicable
coercive measures;
- Time
and location of enforcement;
- Enforcement
procedures;
- Requirements
for security forces;
- Estimated
enforcement costs.
- The
enforcement plan must be promptly sent to the People’s Procuracy, the
police authority at the same level, the People’s Committee of the
commune/ward where enforcement takes place, and relevant agencies,
organizations, and individuals. These entities are responsible for
cooperating in accordance with the enforcement officer’s plan and
requests.
- Within
three (03) working days from receipt of the enforcement plan, the police
authority shall prepare a security plan for enforcement.
- The
police authority is responsible for deploying necessary personnel and
equipment to maintain order, protect the enforcement site, promptly
prevent and handle asset dispersion, obstruction, or resistance to
enforcement, temporarily detain resisting individuals, and initiate
criminal proceedings where signs of criminal offenses exist.
d. Costs of Coercive Enforcement
Pursuant to Article 73 of the Law on Civil Judgment Enforcement:
Costs borne by the judgment debtor include:
- Costs
of notification of coercive enforcement;
- Costs
of purchasing materials and fuel; hiring vehicles, protective equipment,
medical services, fire prevention and firefighting equipment, and other
necessary tools for enforcement;
- Costs
for asset valuation, appraisal, and auction; re-valuation costs (except
where otherwise prescribed by law);
- Costs
for hiring, storage, preservation, loading, unloading, transportation of
assets; labor costs; construction, partitioning, demolition expenses;
surveying and boundary determination costs;
- Costs
related to temporary seizure or confiscation of assets and documents;
- Allowances
for individuals directly participating in and protecting enforcement
activities.
Costs borne by the judgment creditor include:
- Re-valuation
costs if requested by the judgment creditor, except where re-valuation is
required due to legal violations;
- Part
or all of construction or demolition costs if the judgment or decision
assigns such costs to the judgment creditor.
Costs paid by the State budget include:
- Re-valuation
costs where valuation violations occur;
- Costs
of verifying enforcement conditions;
- Other
necessary costs as prescribed by the Government;
- Cases
where parties are entitled to exemption or reduction of enforcement costs
under the law.
- Enforcement
officers must estimate enforcement costs and notify the judgment debtor at
least three (03) working days prior to the scheduled enforcement date,
except where immediate enforcement is required. Such costs shall be
temporarily advanced from the State budget.
- Enforcement
costs shall be settled based on actual, reasonable expenses approved by
the head of the civil judgment enforcement authority upon proposal of the
enforcement officer.
- The
head of the civil judgment enforcement authority shall decide on exemption
or reduction of enforcement costs.
- Enforcement
costs shall be paid by the parties or deducted from recovered amounts or
proceeds from auctioned seized assets, including assets held by third
parties. After asset handling or fund recovery, the enforcement officer
must promptly reimburse any advanced funds.
- The
Government shall regulate allowances for individuals directly
participating in and protecting enforcement activities, as well as
procedures for collection, payment, exemption, and reduction of
enforcement costs.
III. Regulations on the Right to File Complaints in
Civil Judgment Enforcement
Pursuant to Article 140 of the Law on Civil Judgment Enforcement,
regarding the right to file complaints in enforcement proceedings, including
coercive enforcement:
- Judgment
debtors, judgment creditors, and persons with related rights and
obligations have the right to file complaints against decisions or actions
of the head of the civil judgment enforcement authority or enforcement
officers if there are grounds to believe that such decisions or actions
are unlawful and infringe upon their lawful rights and interests.
Time Limits for Filing Complaints
- 15
days for decisions or actions prior
to the application of security or coercive measures, from the date of
receipt or awareness;
- 03
working days for decisions on freezing bank
accounts;
- 10
days for other security measures;
- 30
days for decisions or actions
applying coercive measures;
- 30
days for decisions or actions after
coercive measures have been applied.
Where a complaint cannot be filed within the prescribed time limit due to
objective obstacles or force majeure events, such period shall not be included
in the complaint time limit.
For subsequent complaints, the time limit is 15 days from the date
of receipt of the competent authority’s complaint resolution decision.
Conclusion
Coercive enforcement of assets in civil judgment enforcement is a measure
of last resort to ensure the execution of court judgments and decisions.
Nevertheless, such enforcement must strictly comply with legal regulations to
safeguard the lawful rights and interests of all parties involved.
The above constitutes CELIGAL Law Firm LLC’s overview of
regulations on coercive enforcement of civil judgments. Should you encounter
any legal difficulties, please feel free to contact us. We are confident in
providing high-quality legal services to our valued clients.
Relate news
- LAW ON PERSONAL DATA PROTECTION 2025 – KEY NEW PROVISIONS AND PRACTICAL IMPACTS
- INVESTMENT INCENTIVE SECTORS IN 2021
- LEGAL REGULATIONS ON SUCCESSION BY SUBSTITUTION
- PROTECTION OF THE RIGHT TO USE PERSONAL IMAGES
- SPECIAL POLICIES TO PROMOTE THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PRIVATE ECONOMIC SECTOR
- LEGAL PARTNERSHIP – BUILDING THE ENTERPRISES OF THE FUTURE
- Key Highlights and New Developments of the 2025 Law on Personal Data Protection
- The Government Approves the Reduction and Simplification of Administrative Procedures in 16 Sectors: A Policy Breakthrough in Institutional Reform to Promote the Investment and Business Environment
- ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF BUYING AND SELLING REAL ESTATE AND CARS WITHOUT NOTARIZATION AND MARITAL STATUS CERTIFICATION
- NEW PERSONAL INCOME TAX POLICY: INCREASED DEDUCTIONS FOR TAXPAYERS AND DEPENDENTS FROM 2026
Authors
Hot news
- » CỔ ĐÔNG SỞ HỮU BAO NHIÊU CỔ PHẦN THÌ ĐƯỢC QUYỀN KIỂM SOÁT CÔNG TY
- » RỦI RO PHÁP LÝ KHI ĐẤT CÓ SỔ NHƯNG NHÀ CHƯA ĐƯỢC CẤP SỔ
- » LỪA ĐẢO BAO NHIÊU TIỀN THÌ BỊ ĐI TÙ ?
- » HOÀN THIỆN QUY ĐỊNH VỀ LOGISTICS ĐỂ BẮT KỊP SỰ BÙNG NỔ CỦA THƯƠNG MẠI ĐIỆN TỬ
- » Ngân hàng nhà nước ban hành Thông tư 12/2022/TT-NHNN
- » LOGISTICS TRONG THƯƠNG MẠI ĐIỆN TỬ VÀ NHỮNG BẤT CẬP VỀ PHÁP LUẬT
- » CÔNG TY FINTECH VÀ HÀNH LANG PHÁP LÝ
- » ONEX LOGISTICS AND CELIGAL SIGN COOPERATION AGREEMENT
- » Một Số Điểm Đáng Chú Ý Của Nghị Định 112/2021/NĐ-CP Quy Định Chi Tiết Một Số Điều Và Biện Pháp Thi Hành Luật Người Lao Động Việt Nam Đi Làm Việc Ở Nước Ngoài Theo Hợp Đồng
- » LAND DISPUTE RESOLUTION

